• |
  • 極速報價
  • |
  • etnet專輯
    etnet專輯
  • 會員
  • 產品服務 / 串流版
  • 設定
  • 發布時間︰2018-10-26

    國泰洩940萬乘客資料遲7個月公布,管理層稱徹查需時以免製造恐慌,你接受國泰解釋嗎?(1206人參與)261

    投票已經結束

    投票結果 (1206人參與)

    • 接受
      • 7%
    • 不接受
      • 91%
    • 無意見
      • 2%
我要回應261

相關文章

延伸閱讀

版主留言

    發表於 2018-10-26 10:30 AM
  • 國泰及港龍航空3月外洩約940萬名乘客個人資料,包括信用卡資料、身份證號碼等,部分曾被人下載,已報警處理;私隱專員公署正調查。惟國泰事隔7個月至前日才公布,高層再次致歉,解釋因徹查需時,以免製造恐慌。據歐盟條例,國泰或面臨近40億元逾時通報罰款。專家建議,盡快更改帳戶密碼及啟動雙重認證。

    國泰航空顧客及商務總裁盧家培向受影響乘客致歉,指事件涉24萬名持香港身份證及5萬名持特區護照市民。對於遲公布,他解釋因當時只看到時間端倪,需時了解何種資料被盜及徹查,以免製造恐慌。至於是否黑客入侵,或能否排除是內部員工所為,他稱不會揣測,已交警方調查。

    歐盟《通用數據保障條例》今年5月生效,規定公司要在事發72小時內通知監管當局,否則最多會被罰去年全球總收入4%,或2,000萬歐元(約1.78億港元),計算較多一方。國泰2017年收入為972億元,若罰款4%,即約39億元。

    立法會資訊科技界議員莫乃光指,不排除事件與國泰去年裁減約20%資訊科技員工有關。民建聯葛珮帆批評國泰延誤公布,令乘客無法採取補救措施。

    國泰洩940萬乘客資料遲7個月公布,管理層稱徹查需時以免製造恐慌,你接受國泰解釋嗎?
    發表於 2018-10-26 10:30 AM
  • 國泰及港龍航空3月外洩約940萬名乘客個人資料,包括信用卡資料、身份證號碼等,部分曾被人下載,已報警處理;私隱專員公署正調查。惟國泰事隔7個月至前日才公布,高層再次致歉,解釋因徹查需時,以免製造恐慌。據歐盟條例,國泰或面臨近40億元逾時通報罰款。專家建議,盡快更改帳戶密碼及啟動雙重認證。

    國泰航空顧客及商務總裁盧家培向受影響乘客致歉,指事件涉24萬名持香港身份證及5萬名持特區護照市民。對於遲公布,他解釋因當時只看到時間端倪,需時了解何種資料被盜及徹查,以免製造恐慌。至於是否黑客入侵,或能否排除是內部員工所為,他稱不會揣測,已交警方調查。

    歐盟《通用數據保障條例》今年5月生效,規定公司要在事發72小時內通知監管當局,否則最多會被罰去年全球總收入4%,或2,000萬歐元(約1.78億港元),計算較多一方。國泰2017年收入為972億元,若罰款4%,即約39億元。

    立法會資訊科技界議員莫乃光指,不排除事件與國泰去年裁減約20%資訊科技員工有關。民建聯葛珮帆批評國泰延誤公布,令乘客無法採取補救措施。

    國泰洩940萬乘客資料遲7個月公布,管理層稱徹查需時以免製造恐慌,你接受國泰解釋嗎?

我要回應

登入

發表回應

登記

成為新會員

回應只代表會員個人觀點,不代表經濟通立場

  • 查看全部回應
  • 順序
  • 倒序
  • kapsangza發表於 2018-10-29 09:40 PM via mobile
  • #262
  • *可能潛咗番去公海

  • 引用 #257 Nordost 發表於 2018-10-29 11:15 AM

    俾足12個 Dislikes,A. Ho 都仲係 "speechless"! 唔好用D乜野 “不回應就是最佳蔑視” 的遮醜籍口啦! ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2018-10-29 05:38 PM
  • #261
  • 東印度公司根本是經營鴉片, 骯髒不堪.
    是他們滲透攪破壞, 為事頭婆出口烏氣就真.

  • 引用 #260 Nordost 發表於 2018-10-29 05:14 PM

    國泰可能(*) 被黃C入滲攪破壞!行李門事件就是蛛絲馬跡! (*) 可能o者,毒蟲唔駛緊張罵我住! ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Nordost發表於 2018-10-29 05:14 PM
  • #260
  • 國泰可能(*) 被黃C入滲攪破壞!行李門事件就是蛛絲馬跡!

    (*) 可能o者,毒蟲唔駛緊張罵我住!

  • 引用 #258 ET 發表於 2018-10-29 04:21 PM

    國泰振作下啦! 愈來愈差咁!
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 猫狗比人大發表於 2018-10-29 04:57 PM via mobile
  • #259
  • 懷疑當年8號仔私有化條翻版

    8虢當年一樣跌跌跌不振作下啦!

  • 引用 #258 ET 發表於 2018-10-29 04:21 PM

    國泰振作下啦! 愈來愈差咁!
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • ET發表於 2018-10-29 04:21 PM
  • #258
  • 國泰振作下啦! 愈來愈差咁!
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Nordost發表於 2018-10-29 11:15 AM
  • #257
  • 俾足12個 Dislikes,A. Ho 都仲係 "speechless"!

    唔好用D乜野 “不回應就是最佳蔑視” 的遮醜籍口啦!理虧詞窮就認左佢!又係你自己話會“address issues one by one” ,冇人逼你,而家我大大踢爆你及一眾賣國賊的「民意授權」神話 (#185, #188),你一D都唔敢address ??唔怪得你中文名叫「何斥勤」囉!

    你繼續縮啦!o岩晒呀!我就繼續踢爆黃C歪理!「踢爆自由」!Yeah!

  • 引用 #254 Nordost 發表於 2018-10-28 09:38 PM

    kap:A. Ho 根本連「民意授權」係乜、有冇可能實現,都唔知,就o係度日講夜講! 佢問都未問過任何內地 ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Freemanchina發表於 2018-10-29 10:41 AM
  • #256
  • Exactly!

    "All animals are equal, yet some animals are more equal"! (Animal Farm)

    The fake-democrats are those "some animals" which are more equal.

    They are democratic in words, yet totalitarian in practice by monopolizing the standard of right & wrong, good & bad, white & wrong....

    For the same reason, Jesus, even though as being a man with no wrong-doing, was crucified to death by people under the rule of democracy!

    Democracy will turn into fake once getting in touch with human nature.

    Democracy is the evil tool of devils to destroy human well-being.

    Real democracy never exist in human society on earth.

    Democracy should be discarded like sxxxx & flushed away asap!

  • 引用 #254 Nordost 發表於 2018-10-28 09:38 PM

    kap:A. Ho 根本連「民意授權」係乜、有冇可能實現,都唔知,就o係度日講夜講! 佢問都未問過任何內地 ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Simple_naive發表於 2018-10-29 09:34 AM via mobile
  • #255
  • 相信絕大部份都唔滿意啦!香港人打落水狗絕對係强項!
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Nordost發表於 2018-10-28 09:38 PM
  • #254
  • kap:A. Ho 根本連「民意授權」係乜、有冇可能實現,都唔知,就o係度日講夜講!

    佢問都未問過任何內地同胞,就監硬話人好想要有所謂「民意授權」的政府,本身已是十分獨裁、極反民煮的行為!這些黃C邪教徒,分分秒秒都在自掌嘴巴到爆裂!

  • 引用 #253 kapsangza 發表於 2018-10-28 09:20 PM

    Only YOU, the one who never lived in Mainland, request democracy and people's mandate of governme ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • kapsangza發表於 2018-10-28 09:20 PM via mobile
  • #253
  • Only YOU, the one who never lived in Mainland, request democracy and people's mandate of government.

  • 引用 #252 kapsangza 發表於 2018-10-28 08:53 PM

    Up to this momemt, you are still arguing about people's mandate. I tell you the truth. I met qui ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • kapsangza發表於 2018-10-28 08:53 PM via mobile
  • #252
  • Up to this momemt, you are still arguing about people's mandate.

    I tell you the truth. I met quite a number of fellows from Mainland. They agreed that China had her own problems, like the poisonous milk powder, bridge collapse and the corruption of some local officials. However, they trust the leaders and felt confident of the future of our country. NONE of them showed that they need democracy or people's mandate of government.

  • 引用 #222 Alexsandrs 發表於 2018-10-28 03:51 PM

    But that is undeniable fact that CCP never has people's mandate.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 猫狗比人大發表於 2018-10-28 07:31 PM via mobile
  • #251
  • 是咁的 髮官角下

    (1) 你講到夠選票大晒咁喎?唔通夠票當選就唔去宣誓議員也能收薪津嗎?

    (2) 可見,「完成宣誓」係議員入職要求不可或缺(話之你夠票)!

    (3) 終審法院話佢地「未完成宣誓」就是咁的 ^o^ 不符議員入職要求

    就話之你投訴 after-thought and unfair action 終院決定終極判決香港法律「是咁的」

    (4) 已有案例判明有做野都要回水,議員不符入職要求也當然跟案例回水啦是咁的議員閣下

  • 引用 #213 Alexsandrs 發表於 2018-10-28 03:41 PM

    The said confirmation is based on the false assumption that the diploma is genuine. But dq-ed le ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2018-10-28 05:44 PM
  • #250
  • Is the life of 500,000 victims deserved respect?
    How do you prove more than 500,000 would have been lost if the atomic bombs had not been applied?
    Show me evidence.

  • 引用 #245 Alexsandrs 發表於 2018-10-28 04:28 PM

    You must be saying ambushing Japan Islands. Did I say it would cost more lives to stay in the wa ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2018-10-28 05:40 PM
  • #249
  • Stability was restored by law enforcement.
    This is domestic affairs.
    You've no voice and neither do USA.

  • 引用 #244 Alexsandrs 發表於 2018-10-28 04:25 PM

    False stability maintained by oppression. More it suppresses, Longer it suppresses, More drasti ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2018-10-28 05:39 PM
  • #248
  • All questions are irrelevant.
    If you want to argue, go Beijing.
    I am not prepared to opine for a mental illness questions.
    The China government is not accountable to you or USA.

  • 引用 #243 Alexsandrs 發表於 2018-10-28 04:24 PM

    1) was that a legitimate situation to call for martial law? 2) why was someone outside the ruling ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 六十後男士發表於 2018-10-28 05:36 PM
  • #247
  • During the WW2, Japanese government was manned by persons who wanted to apply military invasion as policy.
    Your comprehensive ability is very inferior.

  • 引用 #242 Alexsandrs 發表於 2018-10-28 04:19 PM

    Define what is a military government? You become more and more incoherent in words. Post-60 o ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Nordost發表於 2018-10-28 05:29 PM
  • #246
  • 「民主修正」--- 另一呃細路語言偽術!

    講多無謂,睇事實最實際:

    - 美國「修正」了200幾年,出了個特朗普!
    - 台灣「修正」了個貪官騙徒陳水扁!無能土匪蔡英文!

  • 引用 #188 Nordost 發表於 2018-10-28 02:46 PM

    (續#185) 現實世界例子,顯示「民意授權」之荒謬、「民煮政棍」之虛偽: (1) 特朗普祇有46.1%人民票 ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Alexsandrs發表於 2018-10-28 04:28 PM
  • #245
  • You must be saying ambushing Japan Islands. Did I say it would cost more lives to stay in the war longer? Do you treasure the lives of Japanese more than Chinese?

  • 引用 #241 六十後男士 發表於 2018-10-28 04:18 PM

    I teach you the last time. Cut the supplies by surrounding Japan. If you can't follow my opinio ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Alexsandrs發表於 2018-10-28 04:25 PM
  • #244
  • False stability maintained by oppression.
    More it suppresses, Longer it suppresses, More drastic will be the consequences.

  • 引用 #240 六十後男士 發表於 2018-10-28 04:16 PM

    Stability is the primary concern. No give in.
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • Alexsandrs發表於 2018-10-28 04:24 PM
  • #243
  • 1) was that a legitimate situation to call for martial law?
    2) why was someone outside the ruling team who could decide on putting on martial law?
    3) even on martial law, should it be killing without mercy?
    4) even after martial law, should ccp give a detailed account of what happened? maybe, subsequent trials if someone broke any law?
    5) even after martial law, should ccp allow people to speak about it?

  • 引用 #239 六十後男士 發表於 2018-10-28 04:15 PM

    But, the constitution allows the Premier to declare martial law. There are formal channels to o ...
  • 回覆 | 引用 | 舉報
  • 查看全部回應
  • 順序
  • 倒序
最緊要健康
  • 生活
  • DIVA
  • 健康好人生
專業版
HV2
精裝版
SV2
串流版
IQ 登入
強化版
TQ
強化版
MQ