唔好怪條可憐
F 君可能係「由佢小腳指揮佢腦袋」本能原始人

If you think one country system means the central government surrenders all authority to HK, it is ridiculously wrong.
The central government only delegates some of the ruling power to HKSAR through Basic Law.
The ultimate ruling remains at Beijing's hand.
Again, if you do not accept, you may leave HK.

Wrong opinion.
HK territory is belonged to Central Government.
The handover was from UK to China.
Show the web which clause in Basic Law specifies HK owns the territory.
The special check in/out arrangement does not mean HK runs China system.
It is the China official who is doing the checking in/out process.
I know you guy will never be convinced.
You are suggested to burn yourself to protest.

No, one country two systems definitely does not mean Hong Kong territory running PRC system.

一地兩檢 is a fallacy by itself. Before the 1st 檢， it is 一地！ after the 2nd 檢， it another 地 which runs different system from the 1st 地.

一地兩檢 is just hk forfeiting its territory to PRC . That is 100% against the Basic Law.

You haven’t even read the judge’s verdicts, or if you have read it, it’s beyond your understanding. The judge is saying that 一地兩檢 is exactly the manifestation of 一個兩制！And the original intention of Basic Law is not to hamstring us from something that can benefit the society at large.

回覆 #27 wkwong1966

回覆 #22 Sabestian

If there is no rule of law, it will be chaotic?????
If the law is against people's interest, cancel it.
Those who earn their living with law practice must emphasize law.
But, if law is not working for the benefit of people, we don't want it.
Get lost, law *****er.

Rule of law is public interest. If there is no rule of law, it will be chaotic. People will become slaves of law enforcement who will enforce the law randomly to their liking.

And I am entitled to voice my opinion in any public forum.

To avoid a constitutional crisis - is not about personal preference.

To state the real life facts of low utility of the speed rail - is not my personal will either.

You failed to put words into my mouths - I always say the principle of CERTAINTY OF THE LAW.

Which parts of the certainly promote my personal preference. If you are not up to a debate in law, at least behave respectably.

Go to the legal web.
We are indifferent to the so-called rule of law because we do not trust any law if it is against people's interest.
People are not slave of law.
Stay away from us.

Opine must be based on fact and fair analysis.
Your biased opinion has established reasonable doubt on your motive.
At least, your double standard is unconvincing.